Mojo - The Music Magazine

September 2008 / 178

Average user rating 3.8 Rate this cover Your rating I hate it I don't like it It's OK I like it I love it

Comment on this post

• White Album the most incredibly overrated "they'll buy anything cuz we're the Beatles" album ever - Cry Baby Cry and Long Long Long good, but too much filler. Your issue on Beggar's Banquet covered the true album of '68, with every track speaking to the times and giving value for money.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:51 AM | July 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Great new issue it seems!I love the Beatles,especially as they were in 1968 (the coolest gang in the world by far,known by everyone and still mysterious).I can't wait to put my hands on it. Long live the White album.Any chance of it (and the whole discography) being remastered and released any time soon? Best regards, David Huret

  Posted by: David Huret at 01:54 PM | July 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh, and I forgot to mention about the Beatles, the biggest sell-outs (in both credibility and record-sales) of '68 as well -the lyrics of Lennon's Revolution (it's gonna be alright, count me out) were the equivalent of, We're rich/ f*** you, to the peace movement.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:43 PM | July 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Nice cover - but plain white would have been ballsier. Also, don't mess with The White Album.

  Posted by: RockyRaccoon. at 03:47 AM | July 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I do - it stinks (don't be another Beatles zombie: "Beeeatles...Braaaains..."

  Posted by: steve conn at 02:03 AM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• i think steve conn the poster needs a hug - rolls eyes the sun rises - the sun sets the white album - a classic nuff said

  Posted by: soo at 11:59 AM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Nice to read a complete misinterpretation of the Revolution 1 lyrics. How lovely lyrics concerning opposition to destruction can be equated to the Peace Movement defies belief.

  Posted by: Jamie at 04:07 PM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• No, just read Nina Simone and many of Lennon's contemporaries on hearing his lyrics for Revolution - they were viewed as completely out of touch with what was happening with the rise of Nixon and Vietnam, or as Ian McDonald so aptly put it "The lazy navel-gazing of pampered recluses." Dear Prudence, Martha, Rev #9 -self-indulgent dreck. White Album the greatest example of the band's 'they'll buy anything because we're the Beatles' ethos.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:20 PM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• i can´t find the option to but the magazine....can someone help me?

  Posted by: oswaldo garcia at 07:07 PM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'd go for the Beatles take on reality any day over yours Steve Conn. I bought the album when it came out in 1968 and brother it was radical. Unless you were living the American experience that year, and were old enough to be drafted, I suggest you shut the hell up. Stop quoting from Nina Simone too, you poser, you make me sick.

  Posted by: Dick Stump at 08:05 PM | August 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'm sure you WOULD go for the Beatles airy-fairy version of reality, Dick Stump. Yes, I was indeed old enough to be drafted in '68, and you must have been living a true Leave It To Beaver, milquetoast existence to ever consider the White Album radical. And posing has nothing to do with Nina Simone telling Lennon to 'clean his brain' on hearing Revolution. Her thoughts echoed a lot of people who had to live outside the Beatles ivory tower.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:53 AM | August 02 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• This album still holds my attention to this day! Revolution #9 is something that continues to intrigue my senses and explore the possibilities of an ultimate soundscape. Thank you for celebrating this artistic milestone from a very creative period in The BEATLES career.

  Posted by: Max Totten at 08:10 AM | August 02 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• It's amazing hearing Paul McCartney doing "Helter skelter", "honey pie", "blackbird," or "why don't we do it on the road" on one album. These are four different voices, four different songs. This guy is a genius ! Raph

  Posted by: Raphaël Vandenberghe at 10:52 PM | August 02 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Loved the Xray spex interview,also the review of the Tom Waits gig, looking forward to seeing the man live! As for the cd.......mmmmmmmm!! 1977, NO ELVIS, BEATLES OR THE ROLLING STONES!!

  Posted by: at 01:03 AM | August 03 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I posted the above!

  Posted by: clash city rocker at 01:05 AM | August 03 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh Steve Conn, so hip to be contrary, isn't it?

  Posted by: Beatle Zombie at 08:33 PM | August 03 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• That Steve Conn's the only bloke I've ever heard ,trying to diss the White Album....says it all.

  Posted by: Jamie at 10:45 PM | August 03 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• No, boys, just not a lamb to the all the hype like the rest of ya. The Beatles fantasies enjoyable to virgin college ears and complacent yuppies; the Stones for people who actually live and acknowledge the real world.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:41 AM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Awww,come on sonny. This has to be the biggest wind-up since the Panorama April-Fool on spaghetti growing on trees. The Stones were hardly on a par as far as depth and variance were concerned...same old shite all the time.

  Posted by: Mark at 11:47 AM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Stones may not have as much musical variance as the Beatles, but at least with the Stones they always sound like they're throwing their guts into the music. Beatles always sound like ,'wink-wink, we're just doing another cutesy experiment, we're too clever to be really emotionally committed,' which gets tiresome as you get older. I just wanna see his face.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:21 PM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Stones always sound like they're going through the motions with their tracks...the White Album shows how brilliantly-creative and ingenious The Beatles were...expanding the boundaries forther than was thought to be possible. A brilliantly ingenious Album.

  Posted by: Mark at 10:28 PM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• There's a fine line between expanding boundaries and dealing out musical masturbation at the buyer's expense, and "I'm So Tired," "Bungalow Bill" "Wild Honey Pie" and "Revolution #9" unfortunately crosses it. Only the very latest albums of the Stones have a going-through-the-motions quality; in their heyday, their albums scorched the turntable with a vitality and urgency the smarmy, in-jokey Beatles couldn't hope to match.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:43 PM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 1977, I hope i go to heaven, NO ELVIS, BEATLES OR THE ROLLING STONES!!!

  Posted by: Clash city Rocker at 11:09 PM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'd say that the two tracks which are less played than the others are Revolution 9 and Wild Honey Pie,leaving just 28 others which are like honey to the ears. Rolling Stones albums are more like skid marks on the turntable in comparison,requiring less brain cells to absorb as a whole.

  Posted by: Mark at 11:39 PM | August 04 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh,I forgot to mention- Dear Prudence is a lobotomized bore, Gently Weeps slow and dull, Martha My Dear pointless, Helter Skelter a mess trying to outdo the Who, the list goes on. The Stones records still grab the listeners' throat, the Beatles drown in sugary George Martin production and count on the zombie fans to keep the myth alive, which like willing sheep they do.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:17 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Helter Skelter is more raucous and ballsy than anything ever put out by the narrow and Repetitive Stones,who's entire discography melds into one bloated lump,bedazzled by the brilliance and sophistication of the White Album (less 2 duff tracks)

  Posted by: Mark at 01:20 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• You wish - Helter a drunken, blaring mess with McCartney's 'sounds like he's always about to sneeze' singing more embarassing than ever. Sympathy For The Devil from the same year a sleek missle that makes the Beatles attempts to be cool more cloddish than ever. Stones found every texture in R & B to thrilling effect; Beatles water-down every genre they touch to make acceptable music for easily frightened caucasians.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:58 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve, keep in mind that the Beatles and Stones were two very different bands with different approaches to rock/pop/r&b music. The key to appreciating the two is in listening and taking note of just how they approached the music at that period in its development and how their songs were composed within the pop-music framework. "White Album" would not be the best example to go by when making an analysis of the Beatles approach to rock/pop music. An album like "Revolver" would be a MUCH better example (at the risk of sounding cliche, but it's true). In reference to Nina Simone's comment on Lennon's lyrics to "Revolution", the controversy seems to rest with the phrase "count me out" followed by "in" (on the single). Having come to learn of Lennon's stance on war AND peace based on subsequent expression of his thoughts on the matter, it always seemed "count me out" meant not wanting to be an accessory to, or contribute in any way to, the destructive/counter-productive policies of the governing bodies at that time, in the push to escalate the military offensive in Indochina. At the same time, Lennon sang "but if you go carryin' pictures of Chairman Mao / you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow", which can be interpreted as a denunciation of the oppressive aspects of institutionalized socialism. Perhaps Nina Simone was a communist and objected to this negative portrayal, can't be sure. A warmonger Lennon was NOT. A "controversymonger" is certainly more likely, as evidenced by the direction in which these posts are going. "The White Album" is not so much a cohesive album of songs as it is a jumbled "collage" of contrasting ideas from the band's four members, their state of mind at the time and the subsequent slide toward dissolution. That's what makes the album interesting and makes it stand very much apart from everything else that was going on in the realm of pop music in the late Sixties, including the Rolling Stones (who were very good at what they were doing at the time, with the exception of the monkey-see-monkey-do "Satanic Majesties Request" from the previous year).

  Posted by: Mew-Zick! at 07:19 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Also, the COUNT ME OUT lyric referred to what Lennon saw as the negative flipside of the desired revolution so many were striving for during that time. Militancy and organized violent action towards the establishment was not the answer and only assisted in perpetuating the problem. Incidentally, Marvin Gaye sang about this kind of thing a few years later when he recorded "What's Going On", about war being counterproductive (unless, of course, you stand to benefit financially from it) and not needing to escalate the hostility and too many brother-brother-brothers dying, referring to the war at home and the crisis of conscience which had befallen every cultural group in the vast American landscape by then. The best line, and the most important heart-of-the-matter sentiment in trying to get out of the collective mess::: TALK TO ME, so you can see, what's going on. That's hard to do when the issue gets away from people and becomes bureaucratized and politicized, both human relations AND war as an issue. Government and/or counter-establishment aggression is not the answer to the problem. Public dialogue is (count me IN). That's partly what rests at the heart of Lennon's idea in "Revolution".

  Posted by: Mew-Zick! at 08:04 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• White Album has been appreciated and raved about by Caucasians,Negros and every race under the sun since it's interception. The plodding and screeching Sympathy for the Devil is a punier and much more watered down song and totally overrated-keep trying.

  Posted by: Mark at 11:04 AM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sympathy For The Devil 'Plodding and screeching?' With its brisk afro-Brazillian samba rhythm and incisive, lightning guitar? Wow, You truly ARE tone-deaf, Mark, or at least terminally caucasian (the ideal Beatles fan). True, Sympathy is not a shambling, going- through-the-motions blues number like 'Revolution,' with its incredibly clever rhyme of social commentary of 'chairman Mao/make it with anyone anyhow,' but it tries(snicker).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:16 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Mew-Zick, you make some salient points about Lennon's thinking in writing Revolution, but since the man did vote conservative that year to protect his money, his faith in bureaucracies must have been the source of his half-heartedness of combatting the right-wing takeover of American and English govt. Give Peace A Chance a year later is a touching sentiment, but it means little when Nixon and his cronies have already taken over. I think the time is right for violent revolution, and it would have perhaps spared us another half-decade of the Vietnam nightmare.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:47 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• For tone deafness ,have a listen to Mick Jaggers singing on the aforementioned and over-long track. For someone to believe that is more listenable than tracks such as Dear Prudence and While My Guitar ...unmasks the identity of the real tone deaf person in here. Terminally Negroid fans counterbalance the worldwide and absolute support and admiration of the Beatles White Album,the world over,although not many know the meaning of the word 'snicker'

  Posted by: at 03:57 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Are you kidding?? Dear Prudence and Weeps are such castrated, drug-sodden YAWNS compared to Sympathy's energy. I must have missed the hordes of black people just dying to get a good night's sleep by putting on the White Album (soul music would never put out such navel-gazing, sterile collection of songs).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:10 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The nuances of Dear Prudence and While My Guitar are too subtle for less intelligent brains and stem from a collective who never were in the soul genre at any given point,so that's a dead duck already. Energy doesn't equal quality as many Negros and Caucasians are well aware of,even the ones that we have never met.

  Posted by: Mark at 04:25 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• There ARE no incredibly intelligent nuances to study in either Prudence or Weeps - they are slow, cyclical, bored-to-tears songs from doped-up, pampered composers too complacent to explore anything beyond their belly-buttons (perfect music for cloistered undergrads). Sympathy is energy + powerful, socially relevant lyrics speaking about what's happening in the streets NOW. It and similar-period Stones songs only gain in meaning every decade, while the Beatles end up looking like overproduced, out-of-touch artifacts for nostalgic yuppies.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:09 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sympathy reflected what was happening at the time in 1968 and in 68 only,hence an incredibly dated feel to that unmelodic tosh. Dear Prudence and While My Guitar have no appeal to those who mistakenly assume that speed and energy equate to quality and listenability and that's to say nothing of the songwriting geniuses behind the songs...not bad songwriting for a supposedly doped up and introspective group. Decade by decade the relevance and classic reverence with which the Beatles are held, speeds away even further away from the Stones in terms of longevity and exultance.

  Posted by: Mark at 05:35 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'The sun is up/the sky is blue/it's beautiful/and so are you', 'I look at the world and see it needs sweeping' - SWEET JESUS, if that's genius, relevant songwriting, I'm Winston Churchill. Revered by lobotomy patients, I guess. Good thing you've never heard of the war in Iraq, which songs like Sympathy and Gimme Shelter sum up perfectly. You go ahead and just keep holding the airy-fairy, dusty Beatles in 'classic reverence,' while the Stones continue to express the realities of human existence.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:15 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• There is good and bad in this world and just because someone lacks the human touch,intelligence,sensitivity and emotion reflected by the brilliant and greatest song-writing team of the 20th Century,they seem to think a few simplistic reflections of a 40 year old war reign supreme,when the war songs became irrelevant in the 70's. Please continue to try to laughably reverse the historical facts of music or maybe try chewing a brick...you'd have as much with the latter as the former.

  Posted by: MArk at 06:25 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ah, 'human touch, intelligence, sensitivity, and emotion'- the hallmarks of such charming little neutered artistes like the Beatles. None of that icky Rock sound, no sir! Please, have another piece of Brie and another sip of Cabernet in your gated community and regale us in the glories of those charming little Cole Porters and their guitars. I'm going to put on Paint It Black again to shake myself out of such pretentious horseshit...

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 09:55 PM | August 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• YOu're the pretentious one with the hilarious bullshit you've been spouting,from the off. As well as chewing a brick,try banging your head against a brick wall. Incidentally Brie is a favourite delicacy of Mick Jagger so another 'shot yourself' in the foot' moment there. Next.

  Posted by: Mark at 02:10 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• What does this little 'chewing a brick' obsession of yours have to do with the fact the Beatles are watered-down, self-indulgent bores? Mick may eat brie but at least his music isn't afraid of invigorating its listeners('I'm So Tired' indeed. You sure are, John. Zzzzzzzzz....)

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:30 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Well of course I'm So Tired is going to be sleepy...the clue's in the title. I'd say that the ratio of invigorating songs always has done and always will have the Stones trailing in the slipstreams. Mind the spluttered brie on your way out.

  Posted by: Mark at 05:46 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh, yeah, I forgot the cute 'Get Back' and other speedy Doris Day songs they built for mild little audiences just like you. Whoof! Pulse almost slightly raised with that one! How can Brown Sugar or Shattered with those silly negro influences even compare??

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:53 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Beatles were influenced by Negros and Caucasians and it's a bit rich to call White Album appreciators 'little audiences',especially when your anti-White Album stance leaves you in an audience of one. Keep swimming and drowning against the White tide.

  Posted by: Mark at 06:02 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Against a tide of uncritical 'we'll buy anything the Beatles fart out' zombies like you, Mark, it'd be my pleasure.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:15 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• BTW the great Ian Mcdonald thought Whitey was shit, too.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:17 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• If we liked shit we'd have the entire Stones discography in our collections...not up to scratch. Oh wow,that's 2 White Album haters Mcdonald must be from the same staid and zombified planet as yourself.

  Posted by: Mark at 06:36 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh, c'mon, like you can use 'staid and zombified' to describe anything but McCartney's bourgeois little ditties and your own flatlined tastes (Beeeattttles....braaaaains (look out, it's coming this way!!) BTW McDonald wrote 'Revolution In The Head,' the most respected Beatles book out there and far better than anything your nobody ass will ever produce.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:57 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ok then ,howabout monotonous yawn-inducing tedium,which describes your ramblings to a tee. With such an abuse of the English language as 'nobody ass' I doubt publishers would let you near anything more advanced than crayons,let alone pen a literary work. Keep talking out of your flatulent-filled 'ass',sonny

  Posted by: Mark at 07:03 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Now, now, let's not be jealous over someone who trounces you in wit and style with every entry.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 08:58 PM | August 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Well you certainly trounce me with shit and bile...so you were nearly there...but not quite...again.

  Posted by: Mark at 12:00 AM | August 07 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Well, one has to do SOMETHING to liven up your constipated musings on the lame Beatles.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:04 PM | August 07 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Regardless of the relative merits of the music being discussed,it would appear that old Steve is really quite taken with himself and his opinions.

  Posted by: Robert at 04:04 PM | August 07 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Hi, I'm Mark, and once I've run out of limp defenses for my milksop Beatles I'll resort to taking pathetic shots at my interlocutor. Aren't I sad?'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:30 PM | August 07 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The cover is fine, but why no R.E.M. on the cover? "Murmur" is much better than "The White Album"!

  Posted by: Paul Renner at 10:28 AM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Beggars Banquet?....Awesome. White Album?....Awesome. I can quite happily play both albums back to back in an evening & what the hell, through in a bit of Doris Day too. It's nice to keep tastes not too one dimensional. Sorry Steve, but you seem to be one those people in the pub who has to talk over everyone. I hope you sober up soon. & please try to stop embarrassing yourself. There really is nothing wrong with just liking MUSIC.

  Posted by: Milgate at 10:40 AM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Hi, I'm Steve GoneInTheHead, and once I've finally failed to diss the wonderful Beatles I'll stomp about and have a hissy-fit and try to find my missing senses. I know I'm sad and I have a suspiction everyone else knows it too'

  Posted by: Mark at 12:21 PM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Hey, everybody, it's Mark again. Golly, don't you hate it when people have minds of their own and don't accept that a double-album with five good songs and twenty-five studio jokes might be a snaked-eyed rip-off of their unquestioning fans' dollars? Why can't Steve be a good little sheep and get in line with the rest of the conformist hordes? The nerve!!'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:15 PM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• ''Hey, everybody, it's Steve Wrong again. Golly,I get really irked when people have an opinion different to mine and ,rather than accept that,proclaim loud and proud that I'm right and everyone else is wrong.I'll stamp my feet and continue to be a total twat until people fall in line with my warped way of thinking, which is always the correct one''

  Posted by: Mark at 05:38 PM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Yes, sir, this is Mark, I'm still on the line. What, you say you have a rare CD of John Lennon passing gas into a microphone for ninety minutes? What, some Yoko distillations are there as well? Why, yes, I'll pay double, triple the price, and hold it in classic reverence!! I mean, it has 'Beatles' stamped on the cover, so what else are you supposed to do? ('Oh, and I'm also known for bitching about my interloculator's creative retorts when I don't have anything clever to respond with of my own. Just another fun Mark fact.')

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:45 PM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Yes, sir, this is Steve,...Steve Conn.What do you mean 'you've never heard of me'?I'm the famous twat-extraordinaire who is accepting of everyone's opinions,just so long as they conform to my own.What do you mean 'the one with the overinflated ego who's not as brainy as he thinks he is?'I tell you the Stones are tops,man.Why...because I said so and what I say goes...hello....hello Stop laughing ,asshole!'

  Posted by: Mark at 06:56 PM | August 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Yup, folks, it's me, old Mark again. Can't think of anything interesting to say about the Beatles, so I'll just cross-pollinate my obsession with my mother's twat into some of kind of ranting tirade about Steve being a conformist, even though I've never had a single thought that wasn't ladled out to me by the old Beatles publicity machine. Where's the logic in this approach, you say? Hey, I bought the White Album - logic's not my strong suit.'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:19 AM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Yup, folks, it's me, boring old Steve yet again. Can't think of anything interesting to say about the Stones, so I'll just continue to take leave of my senses and bore the pants off everyone in the world, even though I don't have a single redeeming feature..wit:nope,intelligence:'fraid not,likeability:what's that?,boorishness:that's me,a great pro-abotion argument:flying colours!!!'

  Posted by: Mark at 10:00 AM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Ha-ha, yeah, folks, copycat Mark again. Copy everything, copy Steve's 3rd person dialogue format, try desperately to copy his style, except I'm sure to leave out that extra ingredient of anything of interest to say since I wouldn't actually know wit if it hit me in the face. Wait a minute, here comes the M1 bus. What, somebody left that Lennon Farting album in the road in front of it? Ooh, I must, must have it!!! I guess we're about to put that theory to the test...'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:45 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Ha-ha, yeah, folks, loudmouth Steve again. Diss everything, don't anyone else use MY style of childish replies because it's MINE all MINE!You know the one...bore the pants off everyone with yawnsome and small-minded cat scratching cause I'm interesting and noone else is ...even though I've lost the plot and my ramblings contain less originality and creative thought than a crack-addict who's had a stroke.I'm off to play the Rolling Stones greatest belches,once I emerge from my drug-induced coma.''

  Posted by: Mark at 01:59 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Boy, folks, Mark here - sorry about that, I'm off my meds again. Just start free-associating about my crack-addict, stroke-addled mum and the little cat-scratching games we played when I was a boy (I know,'hello therapy!')and it gets turned into this nervous rant that I hope sounds something like Steve's style but really just represents my rapidly-collapsing psyche. Someone be a dear and call the medics? Thanks.'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 02:13 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• ''Well hello all.It's the mighty Steve here...the one with more shit and bile than my senile old Ma's faeces.My psychologist reckons we'll be conversing for an 'indefinite period' because I'm such a special and unique case..I think that means I'm superb,but he cited the term 'megalomaniac' to a fellow shrink recently so I really don't know. Then the dumb son of a bitch claims that I have a terminal superiority complex,but didn't kiss my feet at any stage.I told him 'I'm Steve Conn-Lord Of The Dickheads'.When he'd finally stopped laughing at that,he asked the lab for a set of electrodes...''

  Posted by: Mark at 02:25 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Thank you for joining the 'Help Mark Telethon,' already in progress. Please send your donation c/o: 1616 Lame Beatles Way, Out of His Gourd, Out of His Gourd, Barking Daft Orchards, 08640 Thanks you for your help. With every donation, we get that much closer to a cure. God bless.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:50 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Shot yourself in the foot with that one Steven. Neither witty,intelligent nor funny.Just totally boring.Getting weaker with each retort. ''Help the Steve''....see, totally trash.

  Posted by: Mark at 10:57 PM | August 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• hihi

  Posted by: coco at 11:54 AM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• how can we buy?

  Posted by: teables at 12:05 PM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• how can we l'buy?

  Posted by: teables at 12:11 PM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• hi how can we buy magazine mojo the beatles thank you for your reponce the teables

  Posted by: teables at 12:16 PM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• teables The edition is a sell-out so your best bet is www.ebay.com

  Posted by: stallingbones at 12:27 PM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Notice, students, the injections on patient Mark seem to be working. The drooling has stopped, the face has slowly regained some shape. Yes, the jealous outbursts and complete lack of creativity remain, but that seemed to be a general trait before the breakdown. I think we're almost ready to remove the dog collar, give it time...'

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:37 PM | August 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• thank you stallingbones a + 8 years french

  Posted by: the teables at 10:22 AM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• is the best paul mccartney!

  Posted by: the teables at 10:24 AM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• thank you stallingbones but as the magazine is English I can not buy gbp and I am french I have purchased the euro

  Posted by: the teables at 10:41 AM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• ''Notice, students, the injections on self-deluded Steve seem to be failing. The resentmen has shown no signs of diminishing ,the visage is still as repulsive as ever (when taking into account his species,we all know it's an uphill task). Yes, the sub high-school rants remain ,as does the severely misplaced self-delusion.However he did give us all a laugh when attaching the electrodes to his testicular area.He's only got one...just like Hitler.''

  Posted by: Mark at 10:49 AM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn is g ay

  Posted by: Dirk at 02:52 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• "Day 14: Great progress in the Mark case. The parroting of the doctor's report suggests his unoriginal, 'desperate attempt to find some creative platform for his wooden thoughts by copying others' personality has almost completely returned to the fore. Unfortunately, the obsession with testicles from his early psycho-sexual relationship with his mum remains strongly present. Recommended: a few daily supervised walks around the courtyard (nothing within sight of a playground), some conjugal visits with his lover Dirk, and an increase by 400ccs of Ephrenol.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:29 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• No joy in the infinitesimal case of the one-bollocked,waste of skin and bones known as Steve 'the tit' Conn.His thoughtless ramblings continue without foresight,witt and charm.This appears to stem from being traumatised by the somewhat unorthodox circumcision he endured as a 2 year old Jew when his senile old ma performed the operation with the aid of a magnifying glass and her teeth.'Old habits die hard...but it was fun in that Concentration Camp',she said at the time,before swallowing her terminally-ugly son's foreskin.Doctors believe that one testicle was lost as a result of one of my kick-in's received by Steve 'mogadon-alternative' Conn by one of the victims of his constant paedophiliac exploits.

  Posted by: Mark at 03:51 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I don't even know Mark. I just know that you are a two-dimensional cartoon character with one testicle. Have a nice life you sad little berk.

  Posted by: Dirk at 04:23 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 14, continued: Notice! Treatment failure! Patient Mark's confusion between witty writing and rambling statements has returned in full force, with the new development of pathetic jabs of anti-semitism and attempts to project his childhood paedophilic/testicular obsession onto the staff. Footnote: Mark's lover Dirk upset over unsatisfactory sexual encounters in Mark's cell, which may lead him to imitate Mark's pretentious, incoherent style. Limited visitations recommended.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:45 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• According to experts,there was a possible mistake with Steve Conn's circumcision.It appears the wrong bit was thrown away.All that's left ,roaming the planet in his skull-cap,which doubles as a crash-helmet,such is the vile reaction he induces in the human race,is a gnarled,twisted piece of human flesh.An examination will be held on the contents of Steve's senile old ma to determine the remaining stomach contents of his embarrassed parent,who claims that, as a plaything in the concentration camps, Steve's Pa could be any one of 5,000 Nazi's ,possibly the one with the Charlie Chaplin moustache...

  Posted by: Mark at 09:23 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 14: Update. Patient Mark's incoherent ravings- alluding to concentration camps, Chaplin, latent issues with his penis, old mum again, and whatever else happens to float through his deranged mind- at least provide the doctors here some mild amusement, like thumbing through a failed imitation of Joyce. This trait combined with his monkey hat and crashing cymbals might earn the institute some profit by having him perform at local carnivals. Proceed with plan under supervised sedation.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 11:13 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Straight-Jacketed Steve (bastard Son of Adolf) is showing intriguing signs when subjected to electrode shock therapy.As the volts surge through his sozzled old brain,his features contort into an impossibly greater degree of ugliness,he fights against the restraints in an attempt to perform a Nazi salute and shouts in a nasally Jewish voice,'Nein,nein.I'm Steve Conn,das fuhrer!' With that, the doctors sigh sadly and proclaim that the perpetual prat has no hope whatsoever...

  Posted by: Mark at 11:43 PM | August 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Footnote, Day 14: Patient Mark's anti-semitic ravings raise some eyebrows, not for their desperate attempts to offend, but through the sheer illogic in his claims of Hitler being the father of a Jew. Still, his dancing, ravings, and cute fantasies about electrodes do amuse the staff. Perhaps we shall have him be the entertainment at the annual clinic party, provided he doesn't fling his feces and attempt to fornicate with the nurses' legs.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:15 AM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yet another poor reposte,Steven (one bollocked bastard son of a Nazi) Conn: irony-recognition,wit and comedic talent being somewhat lacking in your increasingly dull,verbal-jousting efforts.

  Posted by: Mark at 12:59 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 15: Patient Mark continues to regale us with his nonsense juxtapositions and cute imitations of a pretentious literary critic, Nazis and testicles and the like (some childhood fixations never seem to vanish), though the stream is beginning to wear on the staff when they take him on outings to the park. Perhaps a trip to the country, where a nurse tells him to look in the distance and places a revolver to his head, a la Lenny in Mice And Men, is in order. Pathetic little thing (and to think we had just taught him to wipe properly).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:15 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day infinity.Deluded Steve Cohen continues to fight against the tide and deny he's an obnoxious little know-it-all turd of a Yid with delusions of grandeur. His supposed literary bent is heard by everyone else on planet Earth as demented warblings,the polar opposite of real quality,incisive writing.

  Posted by: Mark at 03:26 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 15: sidenote: Interesting that patient Mark continues to equate anti-semitic remarks with 'quality, incisive writing' (a symptom from having to wear a diaper until age 35? Investigate this further).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:54 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day infinity. Pretty dim of impatient Steven to incorrectly match up anti-semitic remarks with 'quality, incisive writing', but then he spends his whole life missing the boat.Must be the heavy sedatives kicking in at long last.His extensive knowledge of lunatic asylums would put Hannibal Lectar to shame

  Posted by: Mark at 04:26 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 15: Patient Mark's childish parroting of doctor's report amusing (slight breakthrough: he has almost grasped how many spaces after a period one starts a new sentence!), but appears to be communicating in his endless stream that he wants to be interred in a proper lunatic asylum. Perhaps for the best. There he can experiment with his new strain of anti-semitism and self-conceived logic in peace.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:09 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• STEVEYOUR AN ASSHOLE

  Posted by: AL at 11:40 PM | August 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Note to security: Mark's other illiterate lover Al has been seen on Clinic grounds, angrily waving around their old butt-plug and demanding carnal gratification. Please escort said individual to authorities if identified.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:05 AM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Folks, the Conn thing is just yanking yer chains. Conn...get it? As in con man, conundrum, contrived, contradictory, conned. Steve, if you are real...you a tweaker? That's what we call 'em here in the US...you like the meth, laddie? 1968 Stones were on their last hurrah with BJ on guitar. Only a musical neophyte would consider the Stones arrangements and playing as anything more that flaccid white boy attempts at black music. Admit it, it's Jagger's lips that keep you a Stones fan. Nothing else is worthy of second consideration.

  Posted by: Soldout in San Francisco at 06:19 AM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sodomized in San Francisco has a point. Why prefer the Stones version of black music, exploring new soul textures in Sticky Fingers and Exile On Main Street and beyond, when you have any number of Beatles albums, where the black influences are so submerged beneath McCartney Care Bear cuteness and Lennon's nasal screeching as to be non-existent, equaling a final product of overproduced boy-band sugar for ma, pa, and the whole Osmond clan to smile along to? Too many nights in the Castro, Sodomized. Afraid that ain't a meth pipe you're sucking on....

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:55 AM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hey folks,ever wondered what Steve Conn looks like?Pig ugly with a face that belongs in a toilet pan? Well here he is!Proof that he's as physically repugnant as he is,both mentally and spiritually. It's the one,the only,Steeeeevvvveeee Connnnnn.(don't laugh too much) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvjErb-QRU

  Posted by: Mark at 12:22 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 16: Patient Mark's outdoor walks temporarily suspended as he has had several instances of throwing contents of his toilet pan on staff and screaming more incoherently than ever (if flinging of drool on passerbys persists, prescribe 400ccs of Sonata and place in solitary confinement).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:52 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn on youtube. Priceless! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvjErb-QRU

  Posted by: Mark at 05:26 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 16, sidenote: Patient Mark's jealousy over doctor's creative pursuits may cause ranting in another direction for awhile. Be forewarned.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:45 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hey folks,ever wondered what Steve Conn looks like?Pig ugly with a face that belongs in a toilet pan? Well here he is!Proof that he's as physically repugnant as he is,both mentally and spiritually. It's the one,the only,Steeeeevvvveeee Connnnnn.(don't laugh too much) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvjErb-QRU

  Posted by: Mark at 05:55 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 16: Patient Mark's vulgarities starting to repeat themselves. Has smeared his cell with feces. Synaptic collapse appears imminent.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 11:39 PM | August 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hey folks,ever wondered what Steve Conn looks like?Pig ugly with a face that belongs in a toilet pan? Well here he is!Proof that he's as physically repugnant as he is,both mentally and spiritually. It's the one,the only,Steeeeevvvveeee Connnnnn.(don't laugh too much) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvjErb-QRU

  Posted by: Mark at 12:07 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• When does this issue reach publication what date exactly ?

  Posted by: whobeatle at 12:58 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• When Patient Mark's last breath escapes his sad, pathetic husk.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:39 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Longer than that...when psychiatric Steve Conn finds some humility

  Posted by: Mark at 02:12 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 16: Patient Mark no longer spraying words but speaking in something that resembles comprehensible communication. Swatting his nose before giving the treat seems to be working, though we must still put down newspaper before letting him roam communal areas. Good days and bad...

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:00 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Psychiatric Steve Conn 'sings' on youtube!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAXe8bP0yK8 Psychiatric Steve Conn gives his vocal chords an airing in his padded cell, captured for prosperity and posted on you tube, purely for comedic purposes. Psychiatric Steve Conn's singing makes Bob Dylans screeching sound positively mellifuous in comparison. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAXe8bP0yK8

  Posted by: Mark at 11:17 AM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, kids, Patient Mark is cute, but don't get too close to the bars, he tends to spin around and splutter strange phrases (see above). Visiting hours are 9-5, feedings at 3.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 09:33 PM | August 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOauD32gaF0 Here's another 'contribution' by Psychiatric Stephen Conn to YouTube. If you can block out the nasal 'singing', have a laugh at the receding hairline and wonky eye. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOauD32gaF0

  Posted by: Mark at 11:23 AM | August 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Note to staff: Please put up sign in front of Patient Mark's cage that he tends to ramble pettily about someone's posts on Youtube, and visitors should wear surgical masks accordingly.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 03:40 PM | August 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Worth another 'promotion' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOauD32gaF0 Here's another 'contribution' by Psychiatric Stephen Conn to YouTube. If you can block out the nasal 'singing', have a laugh at the receding hairline and wonky eye. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOauD32gaF0

  Posted by: Mark at 03:44 PM | August 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 17: And the sad thing about Patient Mark's new development is he tends to repeat himself, despite the obvious disinterest of visitors to his cage (maybe a switch in his dog food brands is necessary).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:15 PM | August 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErbT8r7i70Y Here's another 'performance' by Psychiatric Steve Conn.Check out the zonked out eyes and the Cuckoos-Nest style headgear,perfect for covering a balding head. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErbT8r7i70Y

  Posted by: Mark at 10:20 AM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• shut up steve conn your are an idiot

  Posted by: lennon and his monkey at 01:36 PM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hi Steve. It's great to see you dismiss the Beatles...I love the Stones, but they were quite shit until 68 and tried to copy the beatles in every way (satanic majectic anyone?) The White album is a great mess, and I love it because of that. Besides, If you don't like helter skelter you don't like f*ck*ng rock and roll. And please, stop comparing the Stones with the Beatles. They're both great. Have a rest and drik your cocoa...

  Posted by: GTXS at 01:37 PM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 18: Since throwing feces appears to be Patient Mark's favorite past time, we have let old friends Lennon and his monkey and GTXS into his cage for a pleasant old feces fight. There, our new psychotropic drugs will allow them to see non-existent images from 1964-'68, like the Stones wearing matching suits, singing sterile pop in choirboy harmonies, and being glued to one spot onstage, just like the Beatles. Note: we also commenced banging a crowbar against the bars of the cage, since the noise sums up the aesthetic thought behind the song(?) Helter Skelter. A bold new direction for our patients.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:28 PM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• From www.billdeyoung.com. 1993. Goldmine: With regard to the White Album, you've said that you tried to get them to cut it down to a single–disc, 14–track album. What would you have cut out? George Martin: That's a good question, because it's now such an accepted album. Everyone thinks it's terrific. A lot of people say it's their favorite album. Don't forget, I was looking at it from the point of view of the songs when I heard them, rather than the songs when they were finished. I said to myself, "Let's pick the best and most commercial songs, and let's work on those. Let's forget the other ones for the moment." I'm not saying we wouldn't have recorded those other songs, but I would like to have made a really great album out of the best of the stuff there, and concentrated and work very hard on them. But they wanted everything done at once. I thought they were dissipating their energies rather than focusing them. That was my concern. There are one or two items of dross on the White Album. Goldmine: Such as? George Martin: I haven't got the list in front of me. You'll have to read them off. Was "Bungalow Bill" on that? "Honey Pie?" Goldmine: Yes, and "Wild Honey Pie," "Revolution 9," "Birthday." George Martin: "Birthday." Well, there you go. You're picking them for me! There are songs that are not at the front rank, put it that way. From other groups they probably would be front rank, but these are my boys, they're the greatest in the world, and that's the way I saw it.

  Posted by: George Martin/White Album at 04:39 PM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Seeing the world through Martin-colored glasses, apparently...

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:08 PM | August 16 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hey folks,ever wondered what Steve Conn looks like?Pig ugly with a face that belongs in a toilet pan? Well here he is!Proof that he's as physically repugnant as he is,both mentally and spiritually. It's the one,the only,Steeeeevvvveeee Connnnnn.(don't laugh too much) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvjErb-QRU

  Posted by: Mark at 12:16 AM | August 17 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Non-existent sounds from 1964-'68, like the Stones making decent,everlasting music,laying a footprint in the sand.

  Posted by: Raphaël Vandenberghe at 12:39 AM | August 17 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yeah, raw, riff-based Rock with ballsy, non-cutesy lyrics (unlike Alvin and the..sorry,I mean, the Beatles) that only lay the path for Zeppelin and every serious Rock act of the 70's onward, while McCartney influenced the uncompromising work of KC and The Sunshine band, the Captain and Tennile and Celine Dion.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:00 PM | August 17 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Stones were influential and were it not for the Beatles,they would have been the most influential band ever. As it is they're the second best,which ain't bad going considering their pally rivalry with the Beatles.

  Posted by: Raphaël Vandenberghe at 08:14 PM | August 17 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Second best in influence, first in actually being able to play their instruments without George Martin ladling on the production (evidence: The absymal playing on Let It Be film, vs. the scalding Stones of Gimme Shelter).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:42 AM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Try Their Satanic Majsties Rights for abysmyl instrument playing versus the brilliant Beatles playing on Revolver.Top of the tree.

  Posted by: Raphaël Vandenberghe at 10:16 AM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Some people obviously have too much spare time... Why not use your energy trying to find a cure for cancer or something?

  Posted by: Larz-Thure at 11:33 AM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Playlist: "Long Agos and Worlds Apart" (Small Faces, "Ogden´s...). 20 years after its release it still amazes me how much Ian McLaggan shaped this glorious SF-album. Salute to him. The "psychedelicy" of this record very much owes to Mac´s organ playing. Too bad we couldn´t hear the album live on stage. Dieter Petzold

  Posted by: Dieter Petzold at 03:38 PM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wait a minute, I just finally listened to the damn thing! I take back everything I said! My bad!

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:42 PM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wait a minute, I just finally listened to the damn thing! I take back everything I said! My bad!

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:44 PM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ignore the person using my name in the top two entries. As to the 'who plays instruments better' issue that Raphael came back to - like I said, Revolver smothered in George Martin production to make Beatles sound good, Satanic Majesties the Stones going it alone (though Satanic is alot more fun to listen to than sterile Revolver anyway).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 09:02 PM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hey folks it's true.The Beatles shit on the Stones all day. In my examples I just happen to use the worst example of the Beatles versus the best example of the Stones ,so my arguments are totally skewed. I was kidding all along!

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 11:08 PM | August 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ignore the above impersonator, folks. It's probably drooling Mark again. His surefire ability to miss the point is always the tell-tale sign.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:22 AM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'm with Steve Conn on the Beatles/Stones debate. I'm 45 and have been listening to Abbey Road and Let It Bleed since I was 14. Beatles songs try to worm their way into your brain, whereas Stones songs head straight for the crotch. Perhaps Beatles fans are music snobs who can't maintain an erection?

  Posted by: at 11:26 AM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wide of the mark yourself,Steve Conn,you ugly-bollocked nutter (as usual).

  Posted by: Mark at 01:30 PM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sorry, Patient Mark, as you can see, others are already starting to see the light. We'll clean your kennel in a bit, I promise.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:27 PM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I loved the 'Write Lennon's lost lyric' feature on this website. I wrote, 'Note to self: Rant jealously about Jagger's career since I'm walled in with Yoko.' Too much fun!

  Posted by: Paul at 04:53 PM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Bad luck, Psychiatric Steve Conn. You'll always be second best with your skewed mentality. Keep licking the condensation on your double-insulated walls:you're too psychotic to be released from that straight-jacket

  Posted by: Mark at 06:31 PM | August 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I have no doubt, Patient Mark, you will always be first place, hands down, in the skewed mentality department. The diaper on the head is a dead giveaway.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:09 AM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Why are you guys fighting all the time? I mean, where do you hear the Beatles music anymore anyway, besides Beatles conventions and dentists' waiting rooms? Let the fans enjoy their memories here. It's all they have left.

  Posted by: Carmen at 12:15 AM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wrong for the umpteenth time Psychiatric Steve Conn.Your suspiciously wide knowledge of Cuckoos-nest type mental institutions and the medicatons in use in such establishments has you out in front in that one.

  Posted by: Mark at 10:18 AM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I have!

  Posted by: the teables at 11:00 AM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Note to waiting room staff: Please cover furniture in plastic, as Patient Mark is loose and dribbling uncontrollably.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:14 PM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Psychiatric Steve Conn in dire need of electric-shock treatment (making more nonsense than humanly possible). Electrodes for his Hitler-esque testicle,required.

  Posted by: Mark at 07:37 PM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Day 20: Patient Mark free-associating about his Hitler/testicular obsession again (no more conjugal visits from his mother!)

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:20 PM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ha! You're right Steve, mate, that dude Mark does seem to have something for old Adolf and the testicles bit. Maybe poor guy does need some therapy. Narf.

  Posted by: Nigel at 10:24 PM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Psychiatric Steve Conn feeling ill-effects from electric current flowing through his single Hitleresque bollock. Cause: memories of his senile old Ma prostituting her wares in the Nazi concentration camp.

  Posted by: Mark at 11:31 PM | August 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yeah Iagree with Nigel. I've been following this blog and this Mark guy seems totally obsessed with testicles, senility, and concentration camps. And it does seem to have some anti-Jewish overtones. Dude has some serious issues.

  Posted by: Becky L. at 07:35 AM | August 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• From what I can gather , the insults have been flying both ways with this Steve guy kicking off ie Steve insulte Marks Mother , Mark insults Steve's Mother back. Call it off guys.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 10:25 AM | August 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Arf I agree. Let other people comment on Whitey (though I do think Steve gets the upperhand of it - Mark just ravin' loon).

  Posted by: Nigel at 06:39 PM | August 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Neither of them exactly covers themselves in glory. One's a loon and one's in love with himself a tad too much. Let's all move on, now

  Posted by: Darren D. at 07:00 PM | August 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• And Darren D is Christ come down from the cross to cleanse us of all our sins. Get stuffed, Carin' Darren.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 08:19 PM | August 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• If you spot Mark on the street, keep the cattle-prod at the ready lol

  Posted by: RandyM at 08:58 PM | August 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• (Sigh) It was going so well, up until the one in love with himself returned.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 09:03 PM | August 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• You're right, Darren D. Why ARE you writing another post, anyway?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:24 PM | August 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The one that loves himself a bit too much makes a joke. Tumbleweed rolls across the room....

  Posted by: Darren D. at 10:51 AM | August 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Tumbleweed rolls across the room...' Okay, we're waiting for the punchline to your joke, Darren.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:14 PM | August 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Very Witty. The one that loves himself a bit too much is, as we all know, your good self, Steve.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 11:48 AM | August 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• mmamammammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaaaa

  Posted by: rutles at 03:41 PM | August 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• But how can you be me, Darren? It defies any logic or philosophy. Explain please.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:39 PM | August 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• You crack me up, steve conn. Beatles fans are mindless sheep while fans of that little-known, underground band The Rolling Stones are... what?

  Posted by: D at 11:41 PM | August 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• No need to explain. The rest of us are all in on the joke.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 12:13 AM | August 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh, yes, Darren that little-known, underground band that just broke another attendance record on their latest tour while the Beatles are a sad Frankenstein nostalgia-fest in Vegas. Is that the band you mean?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:18 AM | August 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Err....that was posted by someone called D. , not myself, Steve.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 12:23 PM | August 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Can't tell any of you apart.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:55 PM | August 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• No worries.

  Posted by: Darren D. at 07:13 PM | August 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn, what a bitter little Stones apologist you are. You're a drag. A well-known drag. I'll close the browser and turn my back on your vitriol.

  Posted by: Joe at 02:47 AM | August 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Who cares what you do, Joe?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:15 PM | August 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ah, don't feel bad, Steve. I, too, am part of the probably not inconsiderable number that thinks the Beatles, aside from a few good songs, are tiresomely cutesy experimentalists out of touch with the world, while the Stones just hurl their heart and soul into it and satisfy every time. We'll just put Exile on again and know what the true goods are...

  Posted by: Erica at 05:35 PM | August 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• You missed my point, Conn man: I find it hilarious that you scorn Beatles fans as mindless sheep while professing your love for the Stones, quite possibly the most popular rock band of all time- listening to the Rolling Stones hardly makes you a rebel.

  Posted by: D at 05:47 PM | August 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• On this blog's 'worship every third-rate White Album track' ethos it does.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:49 PM | August 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Not long after "Revolution" came out as a single, when Lennon sang "Revolution" live with the Beatles in '68, notice he sang "count me out.... IN"

  Posted by: Savoy Truffle at 06:24 AM | August 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• This album, the Beatles' "White Album", finds the Beatles TRYING to get back to their hardcore roots before Beatlemania, but to the new level. Hard rock was coming in because of louder amplifiers that year and more effects pedals, out of the psychedelic period. If you ever heard the Beatles' 1962 Hamburg audience recordings of their live shows then, you know how heavy they often played. Their true coolness was coming through again in 1968, out of the haze of psychedelia. Another endless side coming through. Lennon wanted it heavy and a return to real rock roots and actually went off and did more of that solo. They all seemed to musically spiral off in their directions from here.

  Posted by: Satanic Majesties at 09:01 AM | August 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn as a rebel....haha! Too much hilarity

  Posted by: The Lopez at 10:34 AM | August 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Lopez as someone who's opinion we care about...haha! Too much hilarity.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:34 PM | August 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Besides, circa '68, the Beatles were Queen-approved society entertainers, just back from musing on life in India, ready to record another album, while the Stones, embarking on their own album, were reeling from busts, trials, Brian Jones' disintegration, and the English law trying to wipe out their rebellious influence for good, so the argument that being a Stones fan was more rebellious than being a Beatles one in the context of the times makes perfect sense.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:41 PM | August 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I would venture to say that the Beatles are still a more dangerous band. They spearheaded a legalization of marijuana initiative the year earlier by taking a two-page spread ad out in the middle of a popular London newspaper. It was signed not only by them but many others. This as usual cut through all layers of society. Their claims back then still ring true today. Check it. Not long after going after the Stones the same cop went after the Beatles and got two of them. They were the first band that got banned songs from the radio for drug references. They're still right. This album came out after they revealed the truth! A lot of people from the time didn't get it for years and probably still can't grasp it. But we can look back and see all of it as a whole and see it as it really is, which is really really really cool. Forever.

  Posted by: Satanic Majesties at 06:41 AM | August 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn ....haha! Too much hilarity

  Posted by: The Lopez at 10:38 AM | August 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Beatles only put their names on such ads after the Stones became targets and it looked like their own days as the loveable moppets for the whole family were numbered anyway. The Stones were given a court fine for the garage pissing incident in '65 while the Beatles were receiving MBES; Let's Spend The Night Together was banned for sex references in early '67, months before Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds for drug references; and the main members of the Stones were on trial for possible serious time in '67, while Sgt. Pilchard was just doing some minor harassing of Lennon and Harrison two years later- hardly in the same league. It adds up to the Stones being the central scapegoats for sixties counterculture, perhaps adding to their endurance to carry on, while the largely pampered Beatles circled their navels until all that was left was studio gimmickry and smoke and mirrors.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 07:07 AM | August 30 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Steve Conn, why don't you get a life matie, i've been on holiday for over 3 weeks and you're still talking a load of old bollocks!! yer a plonker!!!!

  Posted by: CLASH CITY ROCKER at 03:42 PM | September 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• 'Clash City-Founder of the Pointless Rebuttal' (Just go back on holiday, chum, no one misses you).

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:25 PM | September 11 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The board has taken a vote and the result is that nobody misses me, so I'm off. So long folks.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:04 AM | September 12 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'm here to bore the ass off everyone. C'mon folks.....I'm doing good huh?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:23 AM | September 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Posted by: at 09:31 AM | September 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ignore my pathetic imposter, folks. He's just rummaging around my feet.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:42 PM | September 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yeah Conn, Clash City Rocker's right. I just looked at the bottom of my screen and saw your first post from July 28. That was almost TWO MONTHS AGO. Wow. Wish I had as much free time as you do... oh wait, no I don't.

  Posted by: Miller at 01:51 AM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Then why the fuck are you joining us, Miller? Buzz off.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:43 AM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• There appears to be an influx of Steve Conn's on here. Flattering though it is, you can ignore the ones who swear and curse....assholes.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 11:20 AM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Like the one above me.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:14 PM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Likewise

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:59 PM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• mojo is fast becoming an ever growing hidey hole for advertising, inane awards multi page features, lists, more lists, oh no, we aint got a rel feature idea,lets make up another list...mojo has been dragging a lardy posterior and cutting corners for many months. unless it stops lacing its issues with clear unadulterated filler and instead focus on pulling neat new reseaarch on classic rock etc out of the flames, i aint gona be sticking my nose in yer pages no moooooooooooooooooore.

  Posted by: a fabber gherkin at 07:42 PM | September 15 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Then do something useful Fabber Gherkin and kick the imposter 'likewise' Steve Conn's ass, alright?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:43 AM | September 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Ignore the above poster, folks.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:28 PM | September 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• And my silly clone above THIS post.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:59 PM | September 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Just to be on the safe side, ignore all those posting as Steve Conn.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:17 PM | September 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Posted by: at 11:18 PM | September 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Except of course for above posters like Steve Conn

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 05:19 PM | September 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Let's make this the Steve Conn thread. Opinions and praise for my very good self are most welcomed.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:45 PM | September 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh, it became the Steve Conn thread a long, long time ago...

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 10:53 PM | September 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Don't all rush forward with praise for my good self....anyone?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 09:42 AM | September 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Posted by: at 07:03 PM | September 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'm for you, Steve. Me and the gang at the office love you!!!!!!!

  Posted by: Lisa at 01:46 AM | September 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Same here, Steve-o.

  Posted by: Vic at 01:47 AM | September 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Same here, Steve-o.

  Posted by: Vic at 01:47 AM | September 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Thanks, folks.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 08:15 AM | September 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• At last! I knew I wasn't despised by the world and it's wife, so thanks for the two who think I'm alright. xxxxx

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:50 PM | September 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sorry, folks, my sad imposter above who doesn't have the balls go under his own name just doing his usual mumbling. Pay him no mind!

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 01:16 AM | September 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• If there is an imposter in here, he's taking the piss out of the real Steve, who's letting it get to him.

  Posted by: Vic at 10:56 AM | September 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Who asked you, Vic?

  Posted by: at 09:57 PM | September 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Don't let'em get to you, Steve. You the king of this blog.

  Posted by: Sheila at 09:59 PM | September 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Conn man's got a little harem started, Oh steve can i be in your fan club.....................NO TA!

  Posted by: Clash City Rocker. at 11:58 PM | September 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• I'm joining - you've got nerve taking on the Beatles zombies and beyond, Stevie.

  Posted by: David Huret at 02:57 PM | September 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• He can count his fans on one hand and still use it to wipe his ass.

  Posted by: at 03:20 PM | September 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• And who be you, nameless coward?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:58 AM | September 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh I'm just one of many who find you sadder than absolute sorrow.

  Posted by: at 01:05 PM | September 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Those too gutless to even put a name down don't count.

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 04:26 PM | September 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh they don't count...hilarious. Any other rules , chez Conn?

  Posted by: at 06:50 PM | September 29 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• What, is the gutless avenger still talking?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 06:29 AM | September 30 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Brilliant,brilliant! You are a goldmine of unintentional hilarity! Bet you are a wag in High-school.

  Posted by: at 09:51 AM | September 30 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Sorry, I don't hang around the high-schools like you, oh nameless coward (pederasty is illegal in this country!)

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 12:31 AM | October 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wel,I'm obliged to go, being of a schooling age...it's the rules you see. Which year are you in,then, you moronic teen?

  Posted by: at 11:48 AM | October 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• awesome!!

  Posted by: nastassia at 01:12 PM | October 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• .........if there were only 2 good songs on this 30 song epic then this album would have been discarded long ago. If this was such a stinker then the consensus view would be agreeing with S.Conn....but as they are not may be its Con who doesn't get it and needs to improve his music listening skills......this is a very good album and the fact that people continue to think it is testament to this statement.

  Posted by: RayS. at 12:51 PM | November 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• People listen to it because they're slaves to the "everything the Beatles farted out must be great" hype that's been pummeled into them for four decades. Take alot of their stuff out of that context and one would immediately wonder what all the fuss about this nasal, processed cheese was about.

  Posted by: steve at 02:08 AM | November 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Welcome back to naive steve, fresh from his journey to the planet Bollocks.

  Posted by: Gavin at 02:46 PM | November 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Couldn't get in, your mother was too busy sucking on them.

  Posted by: steve at 07:57 AM | November 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh its an imitation steve. A fool following an even bigger fool.

  Posted by: Gavin at 03:46 PM | November 21 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• That's why my comment follows you, Gavin.

  Posted by: steve at 07:58 AM | November 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• You've just admitted you're the bigger fool...well done, steve.

  Posted by: Gavin at 11:17 AM | November 22 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Can't you even follow your own logic, little Gavin? Let's go slowly: 'I, the fool, follow the bigger fool, you.' See, was that so hard? You're such a clever boy, yes you are.

  Posted by: steve at 09:39 AM | November 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh dear, tiny steve,you can't even get that one right. Sit down cross-legged and listen to teacher. "Steve (note the capital letter)= The fool. steve (fresh from Planet Bollocks)= The bigger fool" Now go and learn that, and if you can comprehend , teacher might give you a star. You'd like that, wouldn't you, tiny steve.

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:17 PM | November 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Gavin's sad attempt to copy my style, only amounting in his special brand of gibberish. Back to the basement now, Gav.

  Posted by: steve at 10:12 PM | November 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• ''My style'' Haha. It's an egomaniac alert, almost on a par with that deluded tit Steve Conn. Back to the Kindergarden, tiny steve.

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:05 PM | November 25 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Don't get upset because I caught you parroting me, Gavin. Just go home, read some books, and someday, little guy, you'll develop a style all your own (he's so smart, my little Gavin, yes he is!)

  Posted by: steve at 05:19 PM | November 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Didn't know that a snidey style was the soul preserve of a pre-adolescent tiny steve.Back to your playroom,keep away from sharp objects,learn how to be nice and remember not to choke on your mashed-up Thanksgiving meal.

  Posted by: Gavin at 06:42 PM | November 26 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Wow, Gavin writing in a condescending manner to me just like....hey, just like I did to him! Gosh, he's just so amazingly original! I always wanted a personal sychophant - Gav, the job is yours!

  Posted by: steve at 01:27 AM | November 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• And it's spelled 'sole,' not 'soul.' Watch that spelling, little guy!

  Posted by: steve at 01:29 AM | November 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hehe That's very impressive, tiny steve. You've unearthed a patronising style of writing.....I have to break it to you that it's not original and unique. Dry your weeping eyes and say a prayer to Steve Conn.

  Posted by: Gavin at 11:21 AM | November 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• When you reach puberty,tiny steve, you might be taught that it's incorrect to start a sentence with 'and'.

  Posted by: Gavin at 11:24 AM | November 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Of course you can start a sentence with 'and.' For instance, 'And Gavin's criticism of Steve's style doesn't make Gavin any less of a hack for so obviously copying it.' See, there's an example, little guy (now watch, folks, as Gavin responds in a condescending style that he just pulled out of the air).

  Posted by: steve at 09:16 AM | November 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Absolutely incorrect, tiny steve. As anyone with a brain knows, sentences can't be started with a conjunction. Even that moronic teen, Steve (look at me,aren't I clever) Conn, quite possibly knows that it's just bastardised English.

  Posted by: Gavin at 11:49 AM | November 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• See what I mean, folks? Gavin is just so unoriginal he can't help but copy the condescending manner I started in this thread. Isn't he sad? Just let him yammer on about grammar and maybe he'll go away after awhile.

  Posted by: steve at 06:55 PM | November 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Tiny steve actually admits one of his failings, everyone! Hold the front page ,check out CNN for this Earth-shattering headline. One down, an infinite amount to go.

  Posted by: Gavin at 07:22 PM | November 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Uh-oh. Gavin seems to have confused himself with Steve (not surprising given no one would want to be Gavin, much less Gavin himself). Could someone grab his medication? Thanks.

  Posted by: steve at 05:27 AM | December 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Now silly Steve's trying his tired old self-denial trick, which even his playground chums can see through. Call in the child-psychiatrist for him, now.

  Posted by: Gavin at 01:09 PM | December 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• For sale: Parrot named Gavin. Will dutifully repeat everything you say. Name your price.

  Posted by: steve at 10:19 PM | December 01 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Offered : Dildo called Steve Conn. Acts like a total dickhead. Worthless.

  Posted by: Gavin at 10:20 AM | December 02 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, Gavin the parrot has a problem with expletives, but as you've noticed above will do its best to mimic you. Quite a bargain for such a tattered, feces-strewn bird.

  Posted by: steve at 05:02 PM | December 02 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Still no offers for the Steve Conn Dildo: the biggest penis to give no pleasure whatsoever.

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:55 PM | December 03 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Okay, so parrot Gavin occasionally adds odd homosexual come-ons to his patter, but he's still a bargain! Doesn't anybody want him? ANYBODY??

  Posted by: steve at 07:58 PM | December 05 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Underwhelmed with offers for the Steve Conn dildo: ladies you've never seen such a total cock in your life! Surprisingly, never been used!

  Posted by: Gavin at 02:49 PM | December 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, little Gavin may occasionally bark about your sexual organs as he tries to mimic you. For a parrot, he has deep-seated psychological issues, but on the upside you only have to clean his cage three times a week! C'mon, folks, five cents and he's yours!!

  Posted by: Steve at 04:27 PM | December 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The Steve Conn dildo....bit hard to avoid sexual connotations when dealing with marital aids. Psychiatric Steve swears by it and endorses it as such...accounts for the fact that bids for it have numbered less than one!

  Posted by: Gavin at 05:59 PM | December 06 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yup, rambles a bit nonsensically, doesn't he? We might enter him in the state fair, though (after all, how many parrots do YOU know that can say "connotations?").

  Posted by: steve at 09:03 AM | December 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Please remember, folks, that for this seemingly unshiftable Steve Conn Dildo, it comes complete with detatchable foreskin for that authentic 'Ugly Conn' look.

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:22 PM | December 08 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Okay, so Gavin the parrot may make sad homosexual advances on his owner with his dildo fixation, but at a price of free how can you ignore this bargain??

  Posted by: steve at 06:44 PM | December 09 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• OK I admit it.The Steve Conn dildo suffers from a slight imperfection: it possesses but a single testicle. Steve doesn't want to talk about it. Nonetheless, still a Christmas gift for someone.

  Posted by: Gavin. at 11:02 AM | December 10 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Special trick of Gavin's: Will repeat what you say (in a less humorous way, of course) for a cracker, provided you can wrest his special testicle toy from his beak. Pederast homosexual parrots are quite a find, folks. Take him off my hands today!

  Posted by: steve at 08:13 AM | December 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• This Steve Conn Dildo is proving hard to shift. Can be used by gays, lesbians and transvestites: ths single testicle being a legacy of the shady past of Steve Cock's err...'40'.s family History

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:45 PM | December 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Warning: Parrot Gavin may ramble on about his sordid past with gays, lesbians, and transvestites, using his old master's name to give his feeble little brain some context. You may prefer a pet with a less disturbing history of sodomy, but remember the key words, folks: FREE!!!!!!

  Posted by: steve at 05:54 PM | December 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Listen folks, this Steve Cock Dildo, DOES provide more pleasure than the paltry,pathetic yappings of the moronic teenager on whom it's modelled, namely Steve Conn. OK, such a yardstick doesn't amount to much, but it sure does win the comparison test

  Posted by: Gavin at 06:48 PM | December 13 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, customer, upon ownership you DO get a set of earplugs to dampen Gavin's head-scratching blather. Now will you take him? What, you have a strange dildo obsession too? Why, you're a match made in Heaven!

  Posted by: Steve at 08:57 AM | December 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• OK Guys and Gals. This Steve Conn Dildo is proving to be about as popular as a pork chop in a Kibbutz. I'll tell you what I'll do: I'll discard the packaging, which portrays a picture of Steve Conn's filmstar features (don't laugh!): by all accounts it's been something of a major deterrent, upon viewing.

  Posted by: Gavin at 01:23 PM | December 14 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Okay, Gavin the Parrot comes with a free set of steak knives and a lamp, but that's my final offer! So what if he's developed a strange relationship with the dildo he demands be shoved in his little parrot anus; he has the ability to copy his owner and extemporize in weird ways, as his above non-sequitors have shown. That must be worth something, right?

  Posted by: steve at 05:06 PM | December 18 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Hmm. Seeing as this Steve Conn dildo has about as much attraction as Steve Conn's physiognomy, and rueing the fact that it's another 10 months to Hallowe'en, I can add a nice plump goose to the bargain. Either cook the bird on Christmas Day or let it live and be entertained by it's Goose-steps.

  Posted by: Gavin at 01:50 PM | December 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, you might have deciphered from Gavin's contrived babble that he has a little Goose lover. Wait, where are you going? We had a deal!!!

  Posted by: Steve at 10:05 PM | December 19 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Well folks, if you don't fancy having a Goose stepping around your kitchen at Christmas, I can always replace the Goose with a rooster.Alongside the Steve Conn dildo, you'll be getting two cocks for the price of one.

  Posted by: Gavin at 12:21 PM | December 20 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Yes, yes, what the perverted little Gavin parrot is saying is true - he likes two members rammed in his little parrot anus at once. Okay, if you won't buy him, will you at least euthanize him for me?

  Posted by: Steve at 09:53 PM | December 23 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Oh well, the Steve Conn dildo won't be gracing anyone's Christmas tree this year: not surprising when you see his repulsive face on the box. Happily the Goose has been taken and will be goose-stepping around a happy recipient's kitchen come the big day

  Posted by: Gavin at 10:47 PM | December 24 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• It's true, Gavin the Parrot likes having sex with a goose in his owner's kitchen, too. But look how overjoyed he is about it! How can you denied the perverted, misbegotten little creature its fun?

  Posted by: Steve at 03:24 AM | December 27 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• The much derided Steve Conn dildo failed to go to a welcome home, even after removing Steve Conn's repellant physiognomy from the packaging. However, the Goose happily stepped/marched around someone's kitchen, before ending up being roasted in the gas oven.

  Posted by: Gavin at 02:16 PM | December 28 2008 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Did I forget to mention Gavin likes to fornicate with the goose even after it's been cooked? Too disturbing for you? Okay, I'll include a fifty dollar bill to anyone who takes him. Okay, a hundred! Okay, two hundred (C'mon, people, SOMEBODY TAKE HIM!!!)!!

  Posted by: steve at 05:14 PM | January 10 2009 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Posted by: at 09:11 AM | February 19 2009 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• WOW!!! i dont think ive ever come across such a stench of self loving in my life! Im all for discussion on music and the wonderful variety of it available to all, but these 'steve' characters are amazing! How you can interpret a comment about an album/song into a comment about yourselves is egomania that i will be devastated to come across again in my life! No doubt you will respond to this with some offensive post that you think is hilarious, when really i think you should learn to keep quiet! Post your opinion and move on!! It's easy if you try!

  Posted by: at 01:46 PM | July 13 2009 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Who asked you, 'at'?

  Posted by: Steve Conn at 08:50 AM | July 22 2009 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

• Get lost, Conn-boy

  Posted by: at 07:35 PM | October 02 2009 Report Abuse

  Reply to this post

Comment on this post